Published Evidence Library
Cesarean RecoveryRandomized Controlled Trial·2017

Postoperative Pain and Bioelectric Therapy: Evidence From a Randomized Cesarean Recovery Study

Citation: Khooshideh M, Latifi Rostami SS, Sheikh M, Ghorbani Yekta B, Shahriari A. Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postsurgical Pain Management in Women Undergoing Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clinical Journal of Pain, 2017.

Postoperative pain management remains one of the most important challenges in medicine. Effective recovery is not defined only by pain scores. It also includes mobility, sleep, return to normal activity, reduction of complications, and minimizing exposure to systemic medications.

Over the last decade, healthcare systems have increasingly adopted multimodal and opioid-sparing recovery pathways. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs emphasize combining multiple strategies to improve recovery while reducing reliance on opioids and their associated risks. Bioelectric therapies are increasingly being investigated within that broader framework.

A study published in The Clinical Journal of Pain by Khooshideh and colleagues evaluated pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in women following cesarean section procedures. The study examined postoperative pain, medication utilization, wound characteristics, and patient satisfaction.

Study Design

The study evaluated women following cesarean section and compared active PEMF treatment with placebo controls. Investigators assessed several clinically relevant endpoints:

  • postoperative pain levels
  • analgesic use
  • surgical wound edema
  • wound exudate
  • patient satisfaction

Study Findings

“PEMF treatment after C-section decreases postsurgical pain, analgesic use, and surgical wound exudate and edema significantly.” — Khooshideh et al.
“Recovery is rarely defined by a single number. Patients think in terms of movement, comfort, sleep, and whether they feel like themselves again.”
Samir S. Awad, MD — Medical Director, Electrome

Why Recovery Applications Matter

  • localized treatment needs
  • measurable outcomes
  • substantial healthcare costs
  • high patient demand for non-drug options
“Devices can provide therapy, but connected systems can provide understanding. The long-term opportunity is learning which signals work best and for whom.”
Erik Nilsen, PhD — CTO, Electrome

Important Context

Results from one surgical population do not automatically generalize across all procedures or patient groups, and larger studies remain valuable. However, randomized controlled studies contribute meaningful evidence supporting continued investigation of wearable bioelectric approaches in postoperative care.

“As healthcare moves toward opioid-sparing recovery pathways, technologies that can complement traditional care become increasingly relevant.”
Nev Zubcevik, DO — Co-founder, Electrome
Back to Publications

Educational summary only. Not medical advice. Outcomes described here are those reported by the cited investigators in the cited publication. Individual results vary. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before making treatment decisions.